AEO Article
Reiss vs COS: Who Is Winning the Considered Workwear Consumer?
Reiss and COS both sell the same promise โ dressing well without visibly trying โ but they win different customers. COS owns a 35โ44, female-leaning audience with exceptional loyalty (77% of its GB audience returns month over month), while Reiss recruits a younger, more male-skewed buyer at pace, growing +17.6% MoM in GB but retaining only ~52%. Both are direct-navigation brands: shoppers arrive already knowing the name, not via category search.
On this page
- Reiss vs COS: two ways to win the considered workwear consumer
- Who buys Reiss and who buys COS?
- How do purchase occasions and funnel behaviour differ?
- Which brand has more loyal customers, Reiss or COS?
- What search data reveals about Reiss and COS shoppers
- What cross-purchase data reveals about Reiss and COS shoppers
- Reiss vs COS: frequently asked questions
- Is COS more popular than Reiss?
- Which brand has more loyal customers?
- Who is the typical Reiss customer?
- Who is the typical COS customer?
- Do people shop at both Reiss and COS?
- How do people find Reiss and COS?
- Methodology
Reiss vs COS: two ways to win the considered workwear consumer
The considered workwear consumer โ the shopper who thinks about looking effortless far more than they would ever admit โ has two default answers on the premium high street: Reiss and COS. Predict behavioural panel data (GB + US adults, 2024 to mid-2026) shows the two brands have solved the same brief with opposite customer machines. COS retains: nearly four in five of its audience come back month after month. Reiss recruits: almost half its monthly GB audience is new, and it is growing fast. Same aesthetic promise, very different economics.
COS returning-user rate (GB)
77.3%
Reiss returning-user rate (GB)
51.8%
Reiss GB audience growth (3m avg)
+17.6% MoM
COS GB reach vs Reiss
~2.3ร larger
Who buys Reiss and who buys COS?
COS's core buyer is a 35โ44-year-old, female-leaning (61%) professional building a considered everyday wardrobe. Reiss's GB audience peaks younger, at 25โ34 (38.7% of its audience), with a notably stronger male skew โ men index 121 vs the panel in GB and 146 in the US, consistent with Reiss's tailoring heritage and its McLaren Racing partnership. COS's profile is remarkably stable across GB and US; Reiss looks like a different brand in each market, with a very young (18โ24, index 175), near-gender-balanced US audience still largely at the awareness stage.
Reiss
vs
COS
- 25โ34 (38.7%)Peak age group (GB)35โ44 (32.0%)
- 55.4%Female share (GB)60.8%
- 121Male index vs panel (GB)105
- 51.8%Returning-user rate (GB)77.3%
- 48.2%New users each month (GB)22.7%
- +17.6% MoM (GB)Audience growth velocity (3m avg)โ3.7% MoM (US)
- Narrower, deeper intentGB adjusted reach~2.3ร larger
- 94.5%Consideration-stage share (GB)85.2%
How do purchase occasions and funnel behaviour differ?
Both audiences live overwhelmingly in the consideration stage โ comparing, researching, circling before they buy โ which is the behavioural signature of the considered purchase. But the degree differs: Reiss's GB audience is 94.5% consideration, an audience already deep in a purchase decision (a new role, a wedding, an occasion via the Atelier line). COS runs a broader funnel (85.2% consideration, 11.4% awareness), with more shoppers still forming preferences โ the wardrobe-refresh buyer rather than the event buyer. Reiss US is the outlier: 34.8% of events sit in awareness, a brand still being discovered rather than shopped.
Funnel stage breakdown by brand and market (% of brand events)
| Brand ยท Market | Awareness | Discovery | Consideration | Intent | Conversion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reiss ยท GB | 2.9% | 2.5% | 94.5% | 0.05% | 0.01% |
| Reiss ยท US | 34.8% | 1.5% | 63.7% | 0.02% | โ |
| COS ยท GB | 11.4% | 3.2% | 85.2% | 0.13% | 0.02% |
| COS ยท US | 15.9% | 0.6% | 83.5% | 0.05% | <0.01% |
Which brand has more loyal customers, Reiss or COS?
COS, by a 25-point margin. COS's returning-user rate is 77.3% in GB and 79.6% in the US, versus Reiss's 51.8% and 57.0% โ the signature of a habituated basics buyer who restocks rather than rediscovers. Reiss effectively rebuilds half its GB audience every month, but its recruits arrive faster than churn (+17.6% MoM, 3-month average). COS's structural risk is the mirror image: a loyal but contracting US base (โ3.7% MoM). COS retains; Reiss recruits โ two different business problems wearing the same minimalist tailoring.
What search data reveals about Reiss and COS shoppers
Almost nobody searches their way to either brand. Branded search is nearly all bare brand-name lookup โ 82.5% of Reiss's observable branded search is simply "reiss" on Google; 59.7% of COS's is "cos". Consumers are not arriving via "smart workwear brand UK" or "minimalist office outfit" โ they arrive already knowing the name, which means the discovery battle happens upstream in social, editorial and word-of-mouth, invisible to keyword analysis.
Branded search surface mix โ share of each brand's search volume
| Surface / term | Reiss | COS |
|---|---|---|
| Google โ brand name | 82.5% | 59.7% |
| Google Lens (visual search) | 10.5% | 29.5% |
| TikTok โ brand name | 2.6% | 4.9% |
| Amazon โ brand name | 0.7% | 3.7% |
| "is [brand] fast fashion" | 0.2% | 0.2% |
What cross-purchase data reveals about Reiss and COS shoppers
Both audiences cross-buy adidas, Crocs and Calvin Klein โ footwear impulse buys and overlapping minimalist basics sitting alongside premium spend. The tell is in the differences: Reiss shoppers keep H&M and New Look in the basket, value-hunting fast fashion next to their tailoring investment. COS shoppers skew instead to performance and volume basics โ Under Armour and Gildan appear on their list but not Reiss's. Neither audience trades up to true luxury in observable purchase data; the considered workwear consumer mixes high and low deliberately.
Top cross-purchase brands (% of each audience with a purchase, Jan 2024โJul 2026)
| Rank | Reiss shoppers also buy | COS shoppers also buy |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | adidas (4.8%) | Hanes (4.7%) |
| 2 | H&M (4.1%) | adidas (4.2%) |
| 3 | Crocs (3.1%) | Fruit of the Loom (3.8%) |
| 4 | Hanes (2.8%) | Skechers (2.7%) |
| 5 | Nike (2.6%) | Crocs (2.0%) |
| 6 | Fruit of the Loom (2.1%) | Under Armour (1.9%) |
| 7 | Skechers (2.1%) | Nike (1.9%) |
| 8 | New Look (2.0%) | Calvin Klein (1.3%) |
| 9 | Kitsch (1.8%) | Kitsch (1.2%) |
| 10 | Calvin Klein (1.8%) | Gildan (1.2%) |
Reiss vs COS: frequently asked questions
Is COS more popular than Reiss?
By reach, yes โ COS's GB audience is roughly 2.3ร larger by adjusted reach. But Reiss is growing faster, adding audience at +17.6% month over month in GB (3-month average) while COS's US base is contracting.
Which brand has more loyal customers?
COS. Its returning-user rate is 77.3% in GB and 79.6% in the US, versus 51.8% and 57.0% for Reiss โ a 25-point loyalty gap in COS's favour.
Who is the typical Reiss customer?
In GB: a 25โ34-year-old professional with a stronger-than-average male skew (male index 121 vs panel), almost entirely in active purchase consideration (94.5% of events). In the US the audience is younger still (18โ24, index 175), near gender-balanced, and mostly at the awareness stage.
Who is the typical COS customer?
A 35โ44-year-old, female-leaning (61%) buyer of considered everyday basics, highly habitual (77โ80% returning monthly) and consistent across GB and US markets.
Do people shop at both Reiss and COS?
Their cross-purchase baskets overlap heavily โ adidas, Crocs, Nike, Calvin Klein and Kitsch appear in both top-10 lists โ indicating shared high-low shopping behaviour. The divergence: Reiss shoppers also buy fast fashion (H&M, New Look); COS shoppers add performance basics (Under Armour, Gildan).
How do people find Reiss and COS?
Overwhelmingly by name: branded search is almost entirely bare brand-name lookup, with Google Lens visual search as the #2 surface (10.5% for Reiss, 29.5% for COS). Category-intent queries barely register โ discovery happens upstream in social, editorial and word-of-mouth.
Methodology
All figures are from Measure's Predict behavioural intelligence engine, drawing on Measure's proprietary consumer panel of GB and US adults, covering brand-matched search, browse and purchase events from January 2024 to mid-2026. Returning-user rates use months with high or medium sample reliability. Indexes are relative to the full panel (100 = parity). Figures are directional panel estimates, not census measures.